Craig Wright has been given permission to appeal a Norwegian court ruling concerning his claim to be Satoshi Nakomoto, founder of Bitcoin, CoinDesk has been told.

In October, Judge Helen Engebrigtsen of the Oslo District Court ruled that Magnus Granath (who goes by the Twitter handle Hodlonaut) had been entitled to post tweets in 2019 calling Wright a lfraudr and a lscammerr for saying he was the true founder of Bitcoin.

Wrightrs right to protest that ruling has now been upheld by the Norwegian Court of Appeal, lawyers involved in the case have told CoinDesk, offering yet another twist in an already tangled series of legal cases.

lFor Dr. Wright, this decision means that the Court of Appeals will hear his case and render its own independent decision,r Wrightrs attorney, Halvor Manshaus, told CoinDesk in a statement.

lThe case involves other non-economic interest, aside from just the monetary claims, and may also raise important legal principles for the court to address,r Manshaus, a partner at Oslo practice Schjodt, added. The lawyer cited such issues as ldefamation, protection of the personal sphere and harassment.r

Granathrs lawyers, meanwhile, attempted to play down the significance of the decision in a jurisdiction where there is a presumption that any case can be heard twice.

lThere is nothing dramatic or unusual about the decisionr by the appeals court, said Orjan Salvesen Haukaas, a partner at DLA Piper, in an email.

Manshaus told CoinDesk back in October of Wrightrs intention to appeal, saying that lanonymous online bullyingr could have a lchilling effectr on public discourse. Granath (Hodlonaut) hoped to use the Norwegian case to forestall an unfavorable ruling in the U.K., where defamation laws are stricter.

In the U.K., Wright scored a partial legal victory on Wednesday when he was awarded 900,000 pounds (US$1.1 million) in costs in relation to a separate claim made by podcaster Peter McCormack. Wright was previously awarded only nominal damages by U.K. Judge Martin Chamberlain, who said Wright had lput forward deliberately false evidence.r

In her judgment, Engebrigtsen said Granath had lsufficient factual groundsr for his tweets, after witnesses at the trial demonstrated discrepancies in the documents Wright used to prove his claims, such as typefaces that werenrt around in 2008.

In tweets sent on Wednesday, Wright appeared to signal he was giving up on legal attempts to prove he invented Bitcoin.

Read more: The Bullied Takes the Bully to Court